Reader chimes in about the 1957 Rambler Rebel

1957 Rambler Rebel

Indie Auto reader FF stopped by to respond to our story, “1957 Rambler Rebel was so close yet so far from legendary.”

The idea that the Rebel was more expensive or costly in relation to the brand is pretty much wrong. This was a Nash and Nash was medium-priced car, in the Pontiac, Buick, Chrysler, Mercury class of cars.

The whole point of the Rambler from its introduction was to be a companion car in a two-car garage, a car for the wife. The idea was that an economy car or small car didnโ€™t have to be cheap and basic; it could be appointed nicely and enjoyed by people that owned finer cars.

Hudson also was a medium-priced car. Rambler would continue after 1957 to expand the line and offer the Ambassador nameplate which was again Nashโ€™s top-of-the-line model. The price range of Rambler was very large, depending on how you equipped the car.

— FF

ADVERTISING & BROCHURES:

Indie Autoย invites your comments (see below) or letters to the editor (goย here). Letters may be lightly edited for style.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
James E. (Jed) Duvall
James E. (Jed) Duvall
1 year ago

Why Romney (and Ed Anderson, the V.P. of Styling) did not make the front clip of the 1956-1957 Ramblers more “conventional”, i.e., outboard headlights and perhaps a more elegant grill texture still surprises me, as the Nash sales were not outstanding in 1954 and 1955. The rest of the Ramblers are distinctive and look good from most angles.

DECG50
DECG50
1 year ago

I suspect the inboard headlamps were a Pinin Farina contribution. They featured prominently on the Floride show cars around the same time. I think PF was still consulting at the time this model was developed. The rear end has something of the Peugeot 404 about it too.