Automotive deaths: Where are our memorials?

We don’t like to talk about how automobiles can be deadly. This is most obviously seen in the car buff media, where a “boys with toys” mentality prevails. Hey, don’t spoil our fun by bringing up something real.

To be fair, auto fatalities also receive little attention from American culture in general — aside from gossip about the occasional celebrity death.

Curtis White (2003, p. 105) has noted that every 10 years “we wipe out the population of four cities the size of the one in which I live, Bloomington-Normal, Illinois. Dead. And we leave a population the equivalent of a major metropolitan area (close to three million) as walking wounded, carting around the pain of pins in their ankles, knees like pudding, and ruptured vertebrae. Where is the memorial to those deaths and wounds?”

Auto fatality memorials tend to be in rural areas

Automotive death memorial
Click on photos to enlarge. Full gallery here.

The annual death toll dropped almost 15 percent since White’s words were published. Nevertheless, his point is still compelling. From 2004 to 2018 there were 553,500 motor vehicle fatalities, according to Wikipedia (2020a). That’s almost seven times larger than the number of U.S. military deaths associated with the Vietnam and Korean wars (Wikipedia, 2020b).

So where are our memorials? My experience is that they are most likely to show up in rural areas. A case in point is a lonely stretch of Highway 101 near Humptulips, Washington. Close to the top of a mild grade are two crosses a few yards away from the two-lane road. These memorials are unusually large and well-decorated so I took a few photographs.

The images raise a variety of questions — most notably, what happened? I started to do some research but decided to let the photos speak for themselves. That’s partly to respect the privacy of the families but also to not become so focused on an individual situation that the essay loses sight of the larger issue: the automobile is not a benign instrument.

The car can stop being a toy rather quickly

Yes, cars and roadways have become safer. The 2018 death toll was 33 percent lower than the peak year of 54,589 in 1972. In addition, auto fatalities are far lower than other leading causes of death such as heart disease and cancer, according to data compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics (2019).

Nevertheless, there were 36,960 vehicle fatalities in 2018, the last year when data was available. In an all-too-rare discussion about the dangers of automobiles, The Truth About Cars commentator Pch101 (2014) noted:

“It’s amazing how one can go from being very alive to being very dead in the bat of an eyelash. It’s probably best not to dwell on it, but ignoring the risks altogether can lead to poor decision making. The human body was not meant to travel more than a few miles per hour; we were engineered accordingly, and traveling any speed much above that is a crapshoot.”

To acknowledge automotive deaths does not make one “anti-car” or overly fearful of modern life. It makes one human.

ADDENDUM:

TTAC contributor Steve Lang (2014) wrote about how shaken he felt after a close call he experienced while driving. To which commentator FreedMike (2014) responded, “Glad you lived to tell the tale, Mr. Lang . . . go home, have a beer, and have some excellent sex tonight.”

NOTES:

This is an updated and expanded version of a story originally posted December 29, 2016.

Share your reactions to this post with a comment below or a note to the editor.


RE:SOURCES

Curtis White on automotive deaths

PHOTOGRAPHS:

3 Comments

  1. Driver training programs haven’t progressed anywhere near the rate at which vehicle safety has… you can still fail your license test if you can’t parallel park. Meanwhile cars can now do that for you.

  2. I can only speak for this area, but the Harrisburg region includes three interstate highways (the Pennsylvania Turnpike, I-81 and I-83), along with suburban arteries and plenty of two-lane rural roads.

    The majority of fatalities are young males (although young females appear to be closing the gap) driving on two-lane rural roads after 11 p.m. Alcohol and a failure to wear safety belts are often involved.

    Given those factors, it’s less about unsafe vehicles and/or road design than on the deceased making poor decisions, and suffering the consequences. That tends to mute the outcry over traffic fatalities. You can take the horse to water…but you can’t always make him buckle his safety belt and not drive under the influence.

    • Geeber, you inspired me to look up the statistics for my state, which is Washington. In 2020 the biggest source of car crashes was by teen drivers, although “distracted-driving” accidents were very close behind. Drunk-driving accidents came in third. The statistics did not break out the frequency of accidents due to bad weather, which can be a real issue during the winter.

      I live in a semi-rural area eight miles out of town. The main two-lane road into town has five memorials. Only one of the deaths was apparently related to dangerous road design. Even in my neighborhood there was a fatal crash when a young person drove upwards of 90 miles per hour on a winding residential street.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*